Written on 21st May 2014.
"On the wicked he will rain fiery coals and sulfur; a scorching wind will be their lot."
"On the wicked he will rain fiery coals and sulfur; a scorching wind will be their lot."
"At one point
midway on our path in life, I came around and found myself now searching
through a dark wood, the right way blurred and lost. How hard it is to say what
that wood was, a wilderness, savage, brute, harsh and wild. Only to think of it
renews my fear!"
It's 16:00. I'm
sitting in Roy's (of Wroxham) Cafe, wondering when the stooped older-gentleman
at the counter might finally complete his tortuous order, so that I can avail
myself of a second latte. For the last hour I've alternated between dipping
into, 'Hard Times,'- much in keeping with one's recent moods- or else
scribbling demented notes into the iPad. The regular announcements regarding,
"spectac-lear bargains," in the shoe department, have ceased to amuse
me. Eye on the clock, there's a reasonable chance the father-in-law will be out
of the house from around 16:30- I'll give it 'till 17:00, just to be certain!
On the surface the
signs are probably along the lines of, "Do not approach!" Not
entirely an accurate reflection of my state of mind, but the halo of empty
seats surrounding my person suits my purposes, so let's not yet do anything to
undermine these perceptions.
Many thanks to Dave McLear
In truth I'm almost singing inside- though not yet smiling, but the ice is slowly beginning to thaw- because a number of things seem set to change, hopefully entirely for the better. Three months and four days in to our unplanned-for-homelessness and finally a tiny chink of light has levered itself in between the storm clouds. The clouds, incidentally, are a cliched allegory for the deadening gloom that has accumulated about our persons, over the aforementioned three-and-a-bit months. To boot, our sleepy solicitor has today e-mailed that there are completion documents to be signed.
In truth I'm almost singing inside- though not yet smiling, but the ice is slowly beginning to thaw- because a number of things seem set to change, hopefully entirely for the better. Three months and four days in to our unplanned-for-homelessness and finally a tiny chink of light has levered itself in between the storm clouds. The clouds, incidentally, are a cliched allegory for the deadening gloom that has accumulated about our persons, over the aforementioned three-and-a-bit months. To boot, our sleepy solicitor has today e-mailed that there are completion documents to be signed.
When we found
ourselves suddenly and unexpectedly in need of a floor upon which to spend a
'couple of weeks' neither of us could have anticipated the precise hue or the
intensity of the greyness that was about to ensue. As an occasional artist I
remain at a loss as to what such a hue might be termed, certainly drawing more
from the depths of a bleeding soul than that of the master's pallet.
So... 't was upon
the 3rd February, in the year of our Lord 2014, some three-and-a-bit
months past, that we were readying ourselves for a move to a Harford House,
in the fine city of Norwich. Non-specific administrative matters had dictated
that we would need to rent what-was-to-become our apartment, for a short while,
prior to the purchase of the same.
"A nominal
fee," the developer had said. "After all you'll be buying the
place," the man had gone on to reason. He'd also smiled, "Call me
Sid." With hindsight and some fuller reflection, the most significant
thing said had almost been obscured beneath oh-so-much cheery-sales-pitch small
talk; "I'm a business man," he'd also casually enlightened.
The home move was
booked, the sale of our previous home legally committed to, nowhere else to go!
Or so this man had obviously thought. The precise (and curiously elusive) terms
of the rental agreement finally winged their way through the aether. Oops! My
God, we'd been so naive. So very, very stupid! Wiggle room, at this juncture,
had seemed a highly unlikely eventuality.
The precise terms
of the agreement- never actually spoken- pinged into the inbox. To clarify
then, the "nominal fee" was as follows:
* £200 for the
first week (services included)- hardly 'nominal' we mused.
* £400 for the
second week. Continuing to double with each successive week.
* In addition to
this we were expected to pay the cost of 'setting up' this dubious contract, £450 plus VAT, so another £540.
* And then there
was the tiny matter of a non-refundable deposit of £2,000, just to ensure our
goodwill and commitment to buy.
* So a 'highly
nominal' £3,540 for the first four weeks.
* And an additional
£2,000, to ensure that Sid was not be found out of pocket, should we ever get
to the point where our fast-depleting funds could no longer afford the
planned move.
* A special thanks
must go out to Bruce Faulkner of Faulkner and Rogers Solicitors, for drawing up
this 'nominal' agreement.
Dear ********
I have taken my clients further instructions re your client taking occupation and am instructed that they are prepared to allow your client to do so on the following basis:-
1. Your clients pay my costs of preparing the agreement - Which should be no more than £450 plus VAT.
2. Your clients pay a £2000 deposit repayable on completion but otherwise non-refundable.
3. Your clients pay a licence fee of £200 in the first week, doubling each week until completion or vacation if your clients do not proceed payable weekly in advance (to ensure completion as quickly as possible).
4. Water charges included in licence fee.
3. Your clients pay a licence fee of £200 in the first week, doubling each week until completion or vacation if your clients do not proceed payable weekly in advance (to ensure completion as quickly as possible).
4. Water charges included in licence fee.
5. Electricity and gas included until the meter to 6 Harford House is installed and connected.
I should be able to prepare the document for completion tomorrow and look forward to hearing from you once you are able to take instructions.
With best wishes
Bruce ********
Director
Unanticipated, we wiggled. The in-laws had a camper van. I dutifully phoned Sid to convey our reluctance to accept his 'nominal' offer. "A means to ensure that the solicitors did not drag their feet," Sid was anxious to 'clarify.' "To ensure that 'both' parties are fully protected," he enlightened. I duly ran through the maths for him. The man even had the presence of mind to pretend surprise at the voluminous four week total.
The business man on
the back foot- not a pleasant spectacle- was witnessed to instantly retract,
clearly desperate not to lose sight of our money. A hastily rehashed deal of £200
a week, "with all services thrown in"- Hell, the man hadn't even yet
organised the separate metering of the apartment- was politely declined. And I
honestly was polite! The phone call was thus terminated. Time for the business
man to sweat, I'd considered. Even supposedly desperate not to lose his buyers,
the evident greed had shone through; 'nominal,' even at this late juncture,
continued to mean entirely different things to different parties.
The following day,
or possibly the one after that, I sat down and attempted to convey a
disappointment that had, in reality, already morphed into blessed relief. My
e-mail, though extensive, omitted to state the obvious, that we would be
pulling out of the deal. We had reasoned that such a leopard would be unlikely
to be changing its spots.
Business-like to
the death, the wife of Sid- one 'delightful' trouser-wearing Linda- took time
out of her busy day to convey the couple's disappointment, feigned dismay, that
such a 'reasonable' deal should have caused us "undue concern." The
'benign' Linda e-mailed that this was not a "hard-nosed business man's
deal."
Upon reading this
response correspondence was terminated; it seemed the best of all the available
options. Abuse at least had been circumnavigated.
Hello ******,
Unfortunately Sid is tied-up most of the today but he has asked me to reply to your email, as you can imagine we are both very disappointed to read your comments.
We are not developers, or seasoned builders, we are just a family trying to complete a project that we believe will provide 6 desirable apartments, for 6 happy purchasers.
The rental licence was drawn-up primarily to ensure the solicitors did not drag their feet regarding the completion of the sale, not to cause you or ***** any undue stress. We accept the licence terms may not have been ideal but under the circumstances, and at such short notice, we felt, at the time it was an acceptable solution to a short term problem, and if I may say so, not a solution any hard nosed developer would have offered you.
With regards to the possibility that we might be trying to dissuade you from buying No 6... Nothing is farther from the truth, we have done all that you have asked, fitted fans in the bathrooms, extra sockets in the bedroom, lights in the lounge, installing the washing machine and tumble dryer of your choice, and Sky TV was installed today. What gain would there be for us?
With regards to the possibility that we might be trying to dissuade you from buying No 6... Nothing is farther from the truth, we have done all that you have asked, fitted fans in the bathrooms, extra sockets in the bedroom, lights in the lounge, installing the washing machine and tumble dryer of your choice, and Sky TV was installed today. What gain would there be for us?
We have not accepted any other offers on flat 6, we have not put the property back on the market, as far as we are concerned you have always been the only buyers. If you are prepared to reconsider, we can discuss alternative licence terms, or forget the licence all together.
We all make mistakes and it seems such a shame that you will be missing out on the apartment you want and we will have to start the search for a new buyer again. Probably not something either of us really want.
If we can be of any further assistance please let us know.
Kind regards
Linda *******
One week later we
learned that Sid had thus far omitted to obtain Building Regulations Approval,
nor had he sought to obtain a Building Regulations Approval Certificate. What,
no desire to hasten the exchange date? One was led to wonder when the gentlemen
of Messrs Faulkner and Rogers, or perhaps Sid himself, might ever have brought
this omission to anyone's attention. Currently (21st May) said property remains
unsold, despite the misdirected 'Premium Property' sticker, as tacked on by
Rightmove. Maybe an absence of relevant documentation continues to play its
part, hopefully a far more astute home-buyers' approach is being observed by
other home-seekers.
Agents AbbotFox,
also reluctant to let the business slip through their talons, were quick to
assure us that Sid was,"a lovely man." My God, he smiled often, and AbbotFox had dealt with him on several previous occasions. We had just
obviously, "misunderstood," this, "charming character,"
they were quick to insist. "No, we don't wish to see the e-mailed
contract," the team clarified. Thus the evidence of fossils was
conveniently re-buried. "Any chance that the deal could be reignited?" AbbotFox pleaded. We thought perhaps not. Meanwhile, in the background, other
gushing misrepresentations and falsehoods continued to blossom forth with
apparent gay abandon.
Lest the reader
should think AbbottFox unworthy- which, of course they are- I can assure
him/her that similar dishonesty/evasiveness was heard to abound in the vast
majority of other Estate Agents' offices visited. The 'economic recovery'
unfortunately tends to fuel such, to propagate especially the morally-bankrupt
types in this field, cite the current practises of vast numbers of current
leasing agencies. We could really do with a modern day Charles Dickens, who
might perfectly capture the Victorian political climate in which we currently
find ourselves.
Dante's Eighth
Circle of Hell (Fraud).
Within a couple of
weeks we had 'secured' a far more suitable property. Alas, en route, the
almost criminally-inclined actions of the replacement Estate Agent (Abbotts)
had caused us to effectively rebid for the same property three times. Special
thanks, this time, must go out to one Richard, humorously described as a,
'Sales Negotiator.' Perhaps something approximating to the opposite of a
'Hostage Negotiator.' Where was Jesus, to upset those business stalls in the
temple, born-again Christians might have been thinking. Richard 'assurred' us
that indeed this had absolutely not been the case, with slippery words like,
"I don't know what you heard, but..." We'd heard what you actually
said, Richard, because we were listening. Obviously Sales Negotiator means
something far less savoury than it really should, in these 'heady' times of
'resplendent' 'economic recovery.'
One other
storm-battered home-seeking couple that we encountered, upon the very day of
their hoped for exchange, discovered that their exchange papers had been
amended with a revised contract for an additional ten grand. History does not
recall whether the aforementioned Sales Negotiator was involved in this aborted
transaction. The dawning 'economic recovery' rolled on, sweeping aside the
minor and far less important deities of 'Honesty' and 'Integrity.'
Dante's Tenth
Circle of Hell (Bureaucracy).
We dared to think
that we were almost there; the misguided hopes of the single-home buyers had
again been sorely misplaced. Ranged still before us were the fortified hurdles
of solicitors and the leasehold contract company, The Residential Management
Group. Between the two sets of solicitors and RGM the quest for an 'agreed'
exchange date conspired to tack a further two and a half months onto the
unwieldy process of acquiring our new home. Even in the death throes of these
proceedings Capron and Helliwell were contriving to keep us entirely in the
dark, as yet another snail post communication was leisurely batted back and
forth between the (mis)appointed sets of solicitors. By this time one 'rogue'
concerned individual at RGM had finally broken ranks and expressed his,
"absolute dismay," at the woeful ineptness of his own employer. Alas,
the mighty dinosaur had accidentally trampled upon another client, in its
urgency to feast further at the troughs of 'economic recovery,'
It will take a
while for us to begin to fully appreciate the benefits of again having our own
place. I still awake, expecting to hear the father-in-law a huffing along an
adjacent corridor. Or expecting to hear his pompous tones echoing,
unchallenged, throughout the house.
In search of some
form of sanctuary, I'd walked getting on for 400 miles, worn out and parted
company with one pair of walking boots, and cycled closing in on a thousand.
Best not to ponder too hard on the amount of money spent on coffee...
With hindsight, I'd
like to think that I could dutifully advise others to avoid the estate agents
of Abbotts or AbbotFox, that I might suggest a suitably more focused or
reliable firm of Solicitors than that of Capron and Helliwell or Abbots
Countrywide. If only 't were the case. In mock defence of RGM, they did, in time for the bill, contrive
to insert their own inflated charges of £250, for doing bugger all (and not
very well). The weight of limpets had the docked ship listing severely towards
port (conceivably red wine).
Cash buyers
purchase vacant property- no chain- in just three-and-a-half months! What could
we possibly praise here?
Sadly, Britain in
the 'economic recovery' appears more to want to celebrate these sharp practises
or this questionable accountability, rather than to rectify such malpractice and
ineptness. The consequent and numerous casualties will undoubtedly not be
featuring in the self-congratulatory rhetoric of Messrs Osborne or Cameron. I
have seen very little to suggest that the competitors might be any less
self-interestedly driven. More deregulation needed, Mr Cameron? What do we
think?
I can however
strongly advise the avoidance of a particular developer, by the name of Sid; a
"business man" he of Sid and Linda repute.
"Don't hope
you'll ever see the skies again!"
No comments:
Post a Comment